Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-06 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1145 HB 55 Senator Kerttula moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 20. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 20 failed. Senator Kerttula offered Amendment No. 21 : Add a new section to read: The sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Law to pay judgments and claims against the state for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993. Senator Kerttula moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 21. Senator Pearce objected. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1146 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 21 failed. Senators Kerttula, Duncan, Salo, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 22 : Page 12, line 26: Add $213,500 in program receipts for the Alaska Career Information System. Renumber lines accordingly. Senator Kerttula moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 22. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1147 HB 55 Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 22 failed. Amendment No. 23 was not offered. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 24 : Page 11, line 27: Insert 361.4 GF Program Receipts Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 24. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 24 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 25 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1148 HB 55 Page 21, line 23: Delete 26,785,900 22,216,600 Insert 25,785,900 21,216,600 Page 21, line 24: Delete 8,865,900 Insert 7,865,900 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 25. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis, Pearce, Salo Nays: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 25 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 26 : Page 21, lines 23 - 24: Delete 26,785,900 22,216,600 4,569,300 AEA Agency Operations 8,865,900 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1149 HB 55 Insert 26,665,900 22,096,600 4,569,300 AEA Agency Operations 8,745,900 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 26. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 26 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 27 : Page 21, line 17: Delete 6,248,300 Insert 6,146,300 Page 21, line 17: Delete 5,535,800 Insert 5,433,800 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1150 HB 55 Page 21, line 18: Delete 668,100 Insert 566,100 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 27. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 27 failed. Senators Donley, Ellis, Duncan offered Amendment No. 28 : Page 21, line 29: Delete 10,675,400 10,675,400 Insert 15,074,500 15,074,500 Page 21, line 31: Delete 7,600,900 Insert 12,000,000 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1151 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 28. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 28 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 28 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Little, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 28 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 29 : Page 21, line 29: Delete 10,675,400 10,675,400 Insert 10,678,300 10,678,300 Page 21, line 31: Delete "Alaska Tourism Marketing Council 7,600,900" Insert "Alaska Tourism Marketing Council 7,603,800" Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 29. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 29 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1152 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 29 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Lincoln changed from "Absent" to "Yea". and so, Amendment No. 29 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 30 : Page 21, line 17: Delete 6,248,300 Insert 6,168,300 Page 21, line 17: Delete 535,800 Insert 455,800 Page 21, line 18: Delete 668,100 Insert 588,100 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 30. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 30 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1153 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 30 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 30 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 31 : Page 21, line 17: Delete 6,248,300 Insert 6,165,960 Page 21, line 17: Delete 5,535,800 Insert 5,453,460 Page 21, line 19: Delete 1,563,600 Insert 1,481,260 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 31. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 31 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1154 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 31 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 31 failed. Senators Zharoff, Duncan, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 32 : Page 25, line 8: Delete 2,958,800 1,630,100 Insert 3,096,500 1,767,800 Page 25, line 9: Delete 1,830,100 Insert 1,967,800 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 32. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 32 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1155 HB 55 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 32 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 33 : Page 9, line 14: Delete 8,085,400 8,010,400 75,000 Insert 7,839,100 7,764,100 75,000 Page 9, line 19: Delete 246,300 Page 10, line 8: Delete 12,512,300 5,744,400 6,767,900 Insert 12,758,600 5,990,700 6,767,900 Page 10, line 10: Delete 5,528,700 Insert 5,775,000 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 33. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 33 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1156 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 33 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 33 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 34 : Page 19, line 25: Delete 7,414,200 Insert 8,138,000 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 34. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 34 failed. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1157 HB 55 Senator Little offered Amendment No. 35 : Page 22, line 33: Delete 1,915,300 Insert 2,256,900 Senator Little moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 35. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 35 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 35 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 35 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 36 : Page 23, line 28: Insert 175.0 GF - instead of program receipts net zero Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 36. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 36 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1158 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 36 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 36 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 37 : Page 33, line 9: Delete 3,462,900 Insert 1,962,900 It is the intent of the Legislature that this decrement be taken from the Increment for CH 53 SLA92 - extra fish tax. Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 37. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 37 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 37 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1159 HB 55 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 37 failed. Senator Little offered Amendment No. 38 : Page 10, line 36: Delete 5,871,800 Insert 6,171,800 Senator Little moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 38. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 38 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 38 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 38 failed. Senator Little offered Amendment No. 39 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1160 HB 55 Page 13, line 17: Delete 4,625,700 4,484,600 141,100 Insert 4,703,000 4,561,900 141,100 Senator Little moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 39. Senator Sharp objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 39 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 39 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 39 failed. Senator Little offered Amendment No. 40 : Page 9, line 19: Delete 246,300 Senator Little moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 40. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 40 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 40 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1161 HB 55 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 40 failed. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 41 : Page 24, line 32: Delete 5,435,200 2,386,100 Insert 5,487,800 2,438,700 Page 24, line 35: Delete 4,090,300 Insert 4,142,900 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 41. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 41 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 41 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Kerttula changed from "Nay" to "Yea". 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1162 HB 55 and so, Amendment No. 41 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 42 : Page 32, line 26: Delete 3,392,700 3,137,100 Insert 3,369,900 3,114,300 Page 32, line 27: Delete 806,400 Insert 783,600 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 42. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 42 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 42 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Kerttula changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Kelly changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 42 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 43 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1163 HB 55 Page 32, line 37: Delete 74,285,500 74,285,500 Insert 78,221,000 78,221,000 Page 32, line 38: Delete 33,515,200 Insert 35,304,800 Page 33, line 4: Delete 40,770,300 Insert 42,916,200 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 43. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 43 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 43 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 43 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 44 : Page 33, line 33: Delete 1,941,500 in both places Insert 1,841,770 in both places 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1164 HB 55 Page 33, line 34: Delete 990,300 Insert 890,570 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 44. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 44 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 44 YEAS: 2 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis Nays: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Zharoff changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 44 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 45 : Page 33, line 33: Delete 1,941,500 in both places Insert 1,928,920 in both places Page 33, line 34: Delete 990,300 Insert 977,720 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1165 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 45. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 45 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 45 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 45 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 46 : Page 10, line 15: Delete 7,336,000 Insert 7,692,200 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 46. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 46 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 46 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1166 HB 55 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 46 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 47 : Page 36, line 33: Delete 277,000 in both places Insert 262,000 in both places Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 47. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 47 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 47 YEAS: 2 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley Nays: Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 47 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 48 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1167 HB 55 Page 36, line 33: Delete 277,000 in both places Insert 252,280 in both places Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 48. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 48 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 48 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan Nays: Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 48 failed. Amendment No. 49 was not offered. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 50 : Page 24, line 36: Delete 1,478,000 1,378,000 Insert 1,653,000 1,553,000 Page 25, line 4: Delete 550,200 Insert 725,200 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 50. Senator Miller objected. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1168 HB 55 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 50 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 50 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 50 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 51 : Page 12, line 28: Delete 3,737,400 Insert 3,656,000 Page 12, line 28: Delete 2,532,900 Insert 2,451,500 Page 12, line 30: Delete 518,800 Insert 437,400 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 51. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 51 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1169 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 51 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 51 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 52 : Page 12, line 28: Delete 3,737,400 Insert 3,736,250 Page 12, line 28: Delete 2,532,900 Insert 2,531,750 Page 12, line 30: Delete 518,800 Insert 517,650 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 52. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 52 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1170 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 52 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 52 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 53 : Page 19, line 36: Delete 102.6 Transfer to: Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (page 26, line 31) Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 53. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 53 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 53 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Pearce, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1171 HB 55 and so, Amendment No. 53 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 54 : Page 32, line 26: Delete 3,392,700 3,137,100 Insert 3,480,300 3,224,600 Page 32, line 35: Delete 866,400 Insert 954,000 Perseverance Theater 87,600 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 54. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 54 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 54 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 54 failed. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 55 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1172 HB 55 Page 36, line 29: Delete 42,715,900 42,715,900 Insert 43,656,000 43,656,000 Page 36, line 31: Delete 33,212,200 Insert 34,152,300 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 55. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 55 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 55 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 55 failed. Senators Duncan, Kerttula offered Amendment No. 56 : Page 9, line 34: Delete 30,027,500 29,812,600 Insert 30,635,500 30,420,600 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1173 HB 55 Page 9, line 35: Delete 4,947,000 Insert 5,046,700 Page 9, line 36: Delete 5,035,900 Insert 5,135,600 Page 9, line 37: Delete 4,728,500 Insert 4,827,100 Page 9, line 37: Delete 9,086,900 Insert 9,266,900 Page 10, line 4: Delete 3,014,800 Insert 3,084,800 Page 10, line 5: Delete 2,761,100 Insert 2,821,100 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 56. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 56 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1174 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 56 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 56 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 57 : Page 31, line 10: Delete 37,363,800 10,789,500 Insert 36,363,800 9,789,500 Page 31, line 36: Delete 6,751,900 Insert 5,751,900 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley offered amendment to Amendment No. 57: Page 31, line 10: Delete 37,363,800 10,789,500 Insert 30,611,900 4.037,600 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1175 HB 55 Page 31, line 36: Delete all material. Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of amendment to Amendment No. 57. Without objection, the amendment to Amendment 57 was adopted. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 57, as amended. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 57, as amended, be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 57 as amended YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 57, as amended, failed. Amendment No. 58 was not offered. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 59 : Page 24, line 32: Delete 5,435,200 Insert 5,411,425 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1176 HB 55 Page 24, line 32: Delete 2,386,100 Insert 2,362,325 Page 24, line 33: Delete 1,005,900 Insert 982,125 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 59. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 59 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 59 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Sharp Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 59 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 60 : Page 24, following line 17: Insert 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1177 HB 55 It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Fish and Game is directed to assure that a portion of the revenues resulting from the king salmon sport tags are allocated for a joint study, with the Commerce Department, of the economic impact of all types of fisheries in Southcentral Alaska. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 60. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 60 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 60 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Zharoff Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 60 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 61 : Page 9, line 10: Delete 1,141,000 1,066,900 74,100 Insert 1,080,300 1,006,200 74,100 Page 9, line 12: Delete 60,700 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1178 HB 55 Page 11, line 26: Delete 8,147,700 1,573,900 6,573,800 Insert 8,208,400 1,634,600 6,573,800 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 61. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 61 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 61 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 61 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 62 : Page 4, line 26: Add a new Section 23 to read: * Sec 23. The unexpended and unobligated balance of the oil and hazardous substance release response fund (as 46.08.010) on July 1, 1993, not otherwise appropriated by Section 36 of this Act, is appropriated to the Department of Environmental Conservation for the fiscal year 1994 spill reserve. Renumber remaining sections accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1179 HB 55 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 62. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 62 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 62 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 62 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 63 : Page 31, line 10: Delete 37,363,800 10,789,500 26,574,300 Insert 42,689,900 12,690,300 29,999,600 Page 31, line 14: Delete 1,619,600 Insert 1,834,600 Page 31, line 17: Delete 2,285,900 Insert 2,304,200 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1180 HB 55 Page 31, line 18: Delete 2,102,700 Insert 2,514,700 Page 31, line 22: Delete 2,058,600 Insert 2,273,700 Page 31, line 24: Delete 4,098,200 Insert 5,598,200 Page 31, line 32: Delete 1,914,400 Insert 2,121,600 Page 31, line 33: Delete 894,100 Insert 1,333,100 Page 31, line 35: Delete 3,947,500 Insert 4,854,500 Page 31, line 36: Delete 6,751,900 Insert 7,885,100 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1181 HB 55 Page 31, line 37: Delete 2,388,900 Insert 2,613,900 Page 32, line 5: Delete 4,862,000 Insert 5,599,300 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 63. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 63 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 63 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 63 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 64 : Page 18, line 19: PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Add $250,000 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 64. Senator Kelly objected. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1182 HB 55 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 64 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 64 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Kelly changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 64 failed. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 65 : Page 20, line 19: Delete 43,918,200 1,285,000 Insert 43,927,400 1,294,200 Page 20, line 28: Delete 2,255,200 Insert 2,264,400 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 65. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 65 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1183 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 65 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 65 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 66 : Page 13, line 9: Delete 552,600 Insert 614,700 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 66. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1184 HB 55 and so, Amendment No. 66 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 67 : Page 33, line 36: Delete 465,800 Insert 750,000 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 67. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 67 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 67 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 67 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 68 : Page 34, line 11: Delete 80,004,200 79,670,300 Insert 80,584,200 80,250,300 Page 34, line 30: Delete 7,646,200 Insert 8,226,200 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1185 HB 55 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 68. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 68 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 68 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 68 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 69 : Page 9, line 14: Delete 8,085,400 Insert 7,962,300 Page 9, line 14: Delete 8,010,400 Insert 7,887,300 Page 9, line 19: Delete 246,300 Insert 123,200 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1186 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 69. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 69 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 69 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Pearce, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 69 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 70 : Page 19, line 35: Delete 6,816,100 Insert 6,641,350 Page 19, line 35: Delete 4,362,300 Insert 4,187,550 Page 19, line 36: Delete 796,100 Insert 621,350 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1187 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 70. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 70 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 70 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Pearce Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 70 failed. Senator Donley ffered Amendment No. 71: Page 19, line 35: Delete 6,816,100 Insert 6,748,200 Page 19, line 35: Delete 4,362,300 Insert 4,294,400 Page 19, line 36: Delete 796,100 Insert 728,200 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1188 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 71. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 71 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 71 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 71 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 72 : Page 20, line 31: Delete 13,196,200 Insert 13,192,640 Page 20, line 31: Delete 8,028,800 Insert 8,025,240 Page 20, line 32: Delete 494,100 Insert 490,540 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1189 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 72. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 72 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 72 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Zharoff Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 72 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 73 : Page 11, line 15: Delete 19,485,600 Insert 19,452,110 Page 11, line 15: Delete 9,825,100 Insert 9,791,610 Page 11, line 17: Delete 15,166,700 Insert 15,133,210 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1190 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 73. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 73 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 73 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 73 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 74 : Page 37, line 8: Delete 20,396,300 Insert 20,169,300 Page 37, line 8: Delete 19,904,000 Insert 19,677,000 Page 37, line 19: Delete -2,270,000 Insert -2,497,000 Adjust funding information accordingly. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1191 HB 55 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 74. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 74 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 74 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 74 failed. Amendment No. 75 was not offered. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 76 : Page 26, line 33: Delete 13,403,400 12,425,100 Insert 13,399,750 12,421,450 Page 26, line 35: Delete 644,700 Insert 641,050 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 76. Senator Miller objected. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1192 HB 55 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 76 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 76 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 76 failed. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendments No. 77 - 81 be combined. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Donley offered combined Amendments No. 77 - 81: Page 11, line 37: Delete 2,079,000 Insert 1,918,650 Page 11, line 37: Delete 1,454,400 Insert 1,294,050 Page 11, line 38: Delete 827,200 Insert 666,850 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1193 HB 55 Page 11, line 37: Delete 2,079,000 Insert 2,070,775 Page 11, line 37: Delete 1,454,400 Insert 1,446,175 Page 11, line 38: Delete 827,200 Insert 818,975 Page 27, line 14: Delete 56,910,000 Insert 56,815,840 Page 27, line 14: Delete 12,720,200 Insert 12,626,040 Page 27, line 15: Delete 603,600 Insert 509,440 Page 27, line 14: Delete 56,910,000 Insert 56,902,780 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1194 HB 55 Page 27, line 14: Delete 12,720,200 Insert 12,712,980 Page 27, line 15: Delete 603,600 Insert 596,380 Page 35, line 27: Delete 20,073,700 Insert 20,066,260 Page 35, line 27: Delete 11,903,200 Insert 11,895,760 Page 35, line 28: Delete 13,159,900 Insert 13,152,460 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Taylor lifted the call. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of combined Amendments No. 77 - 81. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall combined Amendments No. 77 - 81 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1195 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendments No. 77 - 81 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Excused: Kerttula and so, combined Amendments No. 77 - 81 failed.